Better Concerts and Music

Enthusiasts of Ayn Rand can rejoice in a rational manner because “Atlas Shrugged” has finally been made into a film and is in theaters. After decades of trying, the novel was finally made into a movie and recently hit theaters in a limited release. That said; the faithful may want to steer clear because pundits are insisting the novel has been utterly ruined by an awful movie. Article source – Critics shrug in reaction to Atlas Shrugged movie in reviews by Newsytype.com.

Huge wait enthusiasts endured

It has taken years to get the best Ayn Rand books turned into movies. Enthusiasts have been waiting. Changing “Atlas Shrugged” from a book to a film was not an easy task. The male protagonist, Galt, had a 57 page monologue, there are plenty of subplots, and the book is over 1,000 pages long. Everybody knows the John Galt speech for one reason. It makes it very clear what Ayn Rand’s philosophy on Objectivism is. Various individuals have tried, and 53 years after the novel hit shelves, the movie is hitting screens. The novel was split into three films by director Paul Johannson and author Brian Patrick O’Toole to fix the length issue. Right now, “Atlas Shrugged Part 1″ is in theaters.

Galt might skip the movie

Most pundits hated the film. Its reviews were bad. One of the lowest ratings was given to the film on Rotten Tomatoes. It got 6 out of 100. Roger Ebert said that dedicated supporters were “in for a letdown” and the film was “the most anticlimactic non-event since Geraldo Rivera opened Al Capone’s vault.” The Reason website’s Kurt Loder said surely it is a good thing Ayn Rand is dead so she does not have to see the film that was “like watching early rehearsals of a stage play that’s clearly doomed.” Peter Travers of Rolling Stone said it was “flapping on the screen like a bludgeoned seal.” Loder writing a scathing review is somewhat ironic; Reason.com is a Libertarian focused news and opinion site, exactly the kind of individuals who ferociously adore Rand.

Consensus is

According to reviews, the movie was not good. Don’t see it. The CGI is derided as being cartoon-like and the acting is relentlessly lampooned. Ayn Rand followers will likely watch every movie, no matter how bad the movie is. Since there is the anti-government message that Tea Party types may like, some say the movie was rushed. The movie may be good if one is a Rand fan who does not care about acting. Every person else may want to stick to the novel.

Citations

Rotten Tomatoes

rottentomatoes.com/m/atlas_shrugged_part_i/

Roger Ebert

rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110414/REVIEWS/110419990

Reason

reason.com/archives/2011/04/14/atlas-shrugged-part-1

In 2008, Joaquin Phoenix declared he was leaving behind his drama profession, to the consternation of his fans. He announced he was going to become a rapper, in a bizarre appearance on the David Letterman show. There is a new documentary, “I’m Nevertheless Here” that was made about him and his fresh career. The critiques are beginning to come out, as the film has just hit theaters.

Some kind of rap documentary

There is a near universal selling point to this film. People want to know what Joaquin Phoenix has been up to. The infamous Joaquin Phoenix Letterman appearance was, for numerous, the last reference point people had for him. He was barely coherent. The majority of the “I’m Still Here” critiques discuss in detail the state he is in. Roger Ebert, in the Chicago Sun Times, makes the point that the bulk of the film is about Phoenix having gone totally sideways, and that seems to be the draw. Ebert does not have a lot to say about every little thing else in the movie. Ebert also maintained that the unhinged Phoenix is the film’s selling point.

It is Phoenix first and puppet show last

All music documentaries are compared, officially and unofficially, to “This is Spinal Tap,” a “documentary” about a fictional band by Rob Reiner. “Spinal Tap” is a classic, and also the “I’m Still Here” critiques aren’t exactly as kind. “Spinal Tap” is a classic. It has a 96 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes. The critics on Rotten Tomatoes give a 55 percent fresh rating for “I’m Still Here”. Common themes in “I’m Still Here” reviews are Phoenix’s drug use, unhinged behavior and lousy production by the film’s director, Casey Affleck. Joaquin Phoenix’s sister, Summer, happens to be married to Casey Affleck, who is Ben Affleck’s younger brother.

No route whatsoever

The rap profession Phoenix had in brain is not taking off. The majority of the movie really is apparently about the actor heading toward certain destruction. Since the advent of reality TV, documentary features about individuals heading for disaster are in vogue in this age of Schadenfreude. Bear something else in mind, though. Most of the critiques also bring up River Phoenix, older brother of Phoenix, who perished from a drug overdose. It is never fun to determine somebody with talent throw it away. Joaquin Phoenix may be determined to do so.

More information available here

Roger Bert

rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100907/REVIEWS/100909992

Rotten Tomatoes

rottentomatoes.com/m/im_still_here_the_lost_year_of_joaquin_phoenix/

Eat, Pray, Love by Elizabeth Gilbert was a sensation, spending a long time atop the New York Times bestsellers list. They made a movie out of it, starring Julia Roberts. The critics have not warmed to it yet. Critics also took Sex and the City 2, the previous sort-of-feminist travel film this year, out back and beat the film like a red headed stepchild. Article source – No good Eat Pray Love movie reviews to be found by Newystype.com.

Voyage of discovery

The book is part self help guide, spiritual quest, and travelogue about how Elizabeth Gilbert dumped her husband out of blue to go travel and rediscover herself. She got a huge advance from her publisher to make the book happen. The film, directed by Ryan Murphy, stars Julia Roberts, Billy Crudup, James Franco and Javier Bardem.

Not many glowing Eat Pray Love movie reviews

On popular film review website Rotten Tomatoes, the film had a rating of 36 percent on the day of release. Beth Accomando from PRI’s The World said “more like eat, pray for it to be over, gag.” Adam Graham from the Detroit News said the film amounted to “an insane fantasy for rich people.” Roger Ebert was not pleased in his review in the Chicago Sun Times. He said to grasp the impact of the movie, “I guess you’ve to belong to the narcissistic subculture of Woo-Woo.” Andy Klein said, in the Christian Science Monitor that when Robert’s character learns to meditate, it “involves emptying her mind – which shouldn’t take much heavy lifting.”

Critics are usually critical

Sometimes critics love to be dogs in a manger, but there’s a underlying theme within the negative reviews. The book was popular for a reason. There’s an uplifting undercurrent to it, about trying to find a spiritual peace of mind and meaning in life. That said, that doesn’t appeal to everyone. It may really have worked better in print. That sort of theme for a book may inspire some when dull others to tears. A book or film like Eat, Pray, Love can try so hard to uplift that it becomes trite and a self parody.

More info on this topic

Rotten Tomatoes

rottentomatoes.com/m/eat_pray_love/

Roger Bert

rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100811/REVIEWS/100819999

SC Monitor

csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2010/0813/Eat-Pray-Love-movie-review